![The Public Domain Review](/static/pdr-logo_2x-a9aa17abb46a7af84cd791867a6031ec.png)
François de Nomé’s Imaginary Ruins
These baroque paintings, with their theatrical chiaroscuro, saturated colors, and love of columns of every kind, were forerunners of the fantastic architecture depicted in Piranesi’s capricci — though for us they perhaps more immediately bring to mind the work of surrealists and futurists such as De Chirico, Dalí, and Ernst.
Nomé’s visions of imaginary cities and ruins, though exceptional, are not without counterparts in the Naples of his day. The paintings of Didier Barra (also born in Metz and with whom Nomé shared a studio in Naples) are similar enough that, up until the twentieth century, both his and Nomé’s work was attributed to a mysterious man named Monsù Desiderio.
There’s no question Nomé’s paintings bear comparison with Barra’s, especially in their fascination with perspective and their use of color. But nothing ever quite matches the menace of Nomé’s skies or the extravagance of his scenes. His paintings of Atlantis, the burning of Troy, and assorted Roman rubble demonstrate a real talent for discovering beauty in disaster — and a real love for dreaming up ever more elaborate architecture.
Fantastic Landscape, date unknown — Source.
Saints Paul and Stephen, date unknown — Source.
King Asa of Juda Destroying the Idols, date unknown — Source.
Landscape with Roman Ruins, date unknown — Source.
The Flight into Egypt, date unknown — Source.
Saints Peter and Paul, ca. 1625 — Source.
Daniel in the Lions' Den, 1624 — Source.
Landscape of Roman Ruins, date unknown — Source.
The Burning of Troy with the Flight of Aeneas and Anchises, date unknown — Source.
Fantastic Ruins with Saint Augustine and the Child, date unknown — Source.
An Architectural Capriccio with a Group of Figures, date unknown — Source.
David in the Temple, date unknown — Source.
The Fall of Atlantis, date unknown — Source.
Hell, date unknown — Source.
Jan 16, 2020